I received an email today with the subject, "Hear a Big Tip from Rick Warren." (Rick Warren is the founding pastor of Saddleback Church in California and author of the "Forty Days of Purpose" books.) Rick knows a few things about growing churches, so I was interested in what this "big tip" might be.
So I opened the email and Rick's article was the first one listed among several. It was titled, "Ask People, 'What Can We Do For You,'" and the first few lines of the article followed. There was also an article underneath Rick's by Mark Brooks titled, "The Secrets of Successful Pastors."
I see articles like the second all the time. We preacher-types are always on the lookout for the next great thing that will make us successful. (Most of the time, these articles are fluff.) But something in the teaser lines of the second article got my attention, especially in light of what Rick had written just above.
One of Rick's sentences said, "Jesus let people set the agenda for the needs He met." However, in the article below, Mark wrote, "we cannot change our message to tickle the ears of those that do not see what we see."
And that's the challenge of preaching right there. On the one hand, we want to give the people what they need. We want the message to be relevant to their daily lives. (It's also admittedly self-serving- if we scratch the right itch, they'll keep showing up and keep giving and maybe even invite their friends.)
On the other hand, we want to be faithful to the truth of the text. We want to be able to confront the hypocrisies of modern-day Christianity and speak a prophetic word. But in doing so, we risk running people out of the church.
We want it both ways.
So I'm asking the question today. Which is more important? If you had to choose, would you rather hear a message that was tailored to your needs or a message that challenged you to examine your life under the light of Scripture?
Post your thoughts. I really want to know.